Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (2024)

Abstract

Surgery for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in 30-50% five-year overall survival. In IMCISION (NCT03003637), a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, 32 HNSCC patients are treated with 2 doses (in weeks 1 and 3) of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) using nivolumab (NIVO MONO, n = 6, phase Ib arm A) or nivolumab plus a single dose of ipilimumab (COMBO, n = 26, 6 in phase Ib arm B, and 20 in phase IIa) prior to surgery. Primary endpoints are feasibility to resect no later than week 6 (phase Ib) and primary tumor pathological response (phase IIa). Surgery is not delayed or suspended for any patient in phase Ib, meeting the primary endpoint. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events are seen in 2 of 6 (33%) NIVO MONO and 10 of 26 (38%) total COMBO patients. Pathological response, defined as the %-change in primary tumor viable tumor cell percentage from baseline biopsy to on-treatment resection, is evaluable in 17/20 phase IIa patients and 29/32 total trial patients (6/6 NIVO MONO, 23/26 COMBO). We observe a major pathological response (MPR, 90-100% response) in 35% of patients after COMBO ICB, both in phase IIa (6/17) and in the whole trial (8/23), meeting the phase IIa primary endpoint threshold of 10%. NIVO MONO's MPR rate is 17% (1/6). None of the MPR patients develop recurrent HSNCC during 24.0 months median postsurgical follow-up. FDG-PET-based total lesion glycolysis identifies MPR patients prior to surgery. A baseline AID/APOBEC-associated mutational profile and an on-treatment decrease in hypoxia RNA signature are observed in MPR patients. Our data indicate that neoadjuvant COMBO ICB is feasible and encouragingly efficacious in HNSCC.Immune checkpoint blockade has become standard care for patients with recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here the authors present the results of a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, reporting safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab prior to standard-of-care surgery in patients with HNSCC. .

Original languageEnglish
Article number7348
Number of pages13
JournalNature Communications
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Dec 2021

Keywords

  • SALVAGE SURGERY
  • OPEN-LABEL
  • RECURRENT
  • CHEMOTHERAPY
  • MUTAGENESIS
  • APOBEC
  • CANCER
  • TREMELIMUMAB
  • RADIOTHERAPY
  • DURVALUMAB

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

View full fingerprint

Cite this

  • APA
  • Author
  • BIBTEX
  • Harvard
  • Standard
  • RIS
  • Vancouver

Vos, J. L., Elbers, J. B. W., Krijgsman, O., Traets, J. J. H., Qiao, X. H., Van der Leun, A. M., Lubeck, Y., Seignette, I. M., Smit, L. A., Willems, S. M., Van den Brekel, M. W. M., Dirven, R., Karakullukcu, M. B., Karssemakers, L., Klop, W. M. C., Lohuis, P. J. F. M., Schreuder, W. H., Smeele, L. E., Van der Velden, L. A., ... Zuur, C. L. (2021). Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nature Communications, 12(1), Article 7348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26472-9

Vos, J.L. ; Elbers, J.B.W. ; Krijgsman, O. et al. / Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In: Nature Communications. 2021 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.

@article{e5a387064c984a15abc354a0df3ad09d,

title = "Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma",

abstract = "Surgery for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in 30-50% five-year overall survival. In IMCISION (NCT03003637), a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, 32 HNSCC patients are treated with 2 doses (in weeks 1 and 3) of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) using nivolumab (NIVO MONO, n = 6, phase Ib arm A) or nivolumab plus a single dose of ipilimumab (COMBO, n = 26, 6 in phase Ib arm B, and 20 in phase IIa) prior to surgery. Primary endpoints are feasibility to resect no later than week 6 (phase Ib) and primary tumor pathological response (phase IIa). Surgery is not delayed or suspended for any patient in phase Ib, meeting the primary endpoint. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events are seen in 2 of 6 (33%) NIVO MONO and 10 of 26 (38%) total COMBO patients. Pathological response, defined as the %-change in primary tumor viable tumor cell percentage from baseline biopsy to on-treatment resection, is evaluable in 17/20 phase IIa patients and 29/32 total trial patients (6/6 NIVO MONO, 23/26 COMBO). We observe a major pathological response (MPR, 90-100% response) in 35% of patients after COMBO ICB, both in phase IIa (6/17) and in the whole trial (8/23), meeting the phase IIa primary endpoint threshold of 10%. NIVO MONO's MPR rate is 17% (1/6). None of the MPR patients develop recurrent HSNCC during 24.0 months median postsurgical follow-up. FDG-PET-based total lesion glycolysis identifies MPR patients prior to surgery. A baseline AID/APOBEC-associated mutational profile and an on-treatment decrease in hypoxia RNA signature are observed in MPR patients. Our data indicate that neoadjuvant COMBO ICB is feasible and encouragingly efficacious in HNSCC.Immune checkpoint blockade has become standard care for patients with recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here the authors present the results of a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, reporting safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab prior to standard-of-care surgery in patients with HNSCC. .",

keywords = "SALVAGE SURGERY, OPEN-LABEL, RECURRENT, CHEMOTHERAPY, MUTAGENESIS, APOBEC, CANCER, TREMELIMUMAB, RADIOTHERAPY, DURVALUMAB",

author = "J.L. Vos and J.B.W. Elbers and O. Krijgsman and J.J.H. Traets and X.H. Qiao and {Van der Leun}, A.M. and Y. Lubeck and I.M. Seignette and L.A. Smit and S.M. Willems and {Van den Brekel}, M.W.M. and R. Dirven and M.B. Karakullukcu and L. Karssemakers and W.M.C. Klop and P.J.F.M. Lohuis and W.H. Schreuder and L.E. Smeele and {Van der Velden}, L.A. and B. Tan and S. Onderwater and B. Jasperse and W.V. Vogel and A. Al-Mamgani and A. Keijser and {Van der Noort}, V. and A. Broeks and E. Hooijberg and D.S. Peeper and T.N. Schumacher and C.U. Blank and {De Boer}, J.P. and J.B.A.G. Haanen and C.L. Zuur",

note = "Funding Information: Study oversight. This study was an investigator-initiated trial with the NKI as sponsor. The NKI designed the study, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. Funding was provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb through the International Immuno-Oncology Network and by the Riki Foundation. The trial protocol and its amendments were reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (MREC AVL, https://english.ccmo.nl/mrecs/accredited-mrecs/mrec-netherlands-cancer-institute-the-antoni-van-leeuwenhoek-hospital), under file number NL57794.031.16. The study{\textquoteright}s design and conduct were in accordance with all relevant regulations regarding the use of human study participants and the 1964 Helsinki declaration, and was consistent with Good Clinical Practice guidelines as formulated by the International Conference on Harmonization. All patients provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. The authors affirm that the patient of whom clinical photography is shown in Fig. 1c provided additional informed consent for publication of the images. The patient depicted in Supplementary Fig. 2 had died at time of writing, and additional informed consent for the publication of the photographs was obtained from the patient{\textquoteright}s partner. Funding Information: J.L.V., J.B.W.E., J.J.H.T., X.Q., A.vd.L., Y.L., I.S., L.S., S.O., B.J., W.V.V., A.A.M., V.vd.N., A.K., E.H., A.B., R.D., L.K., M.B.K., P.J.F.M.L., W.H.S., W.M.C.K., L.vd.V., and I.B.T. declare no competing interests. C.L.Z. reports receiving institutional research financial support from BMS to fund the present trial. M.W.M.vd.B. reports, outside the submitted work, institutional research funding from ATOS Medical. S.M.W. reports, all outside the submitted work: institutional research funding from Roche, Pfizer, MSD, Bayer, Amgen, BMS, AstraZeneca, Lilly and Nextcure. O.K. is employed at Neogene Therapeutics B.V., though at time of analysis and writing his employment was at the NKI. O.K. further reports, outside the submitted work, a pending patent application (title: “Gene signatures and method for predicting response to pd-1 antagonists and ctla-4 antagonists, and combination thereof”, number: WO2020005068A8). D.S.P. reports, all outside the submitted work, a pending patent application (title: “Gene signatures and method for predicting response to pd-1 antagonists and ctla-4 antagonists, and combination thereof”, number: WO2020005068A8) and a role as co-founder, shareholder and advisor of Immagene. J.P.d.B. reports, all outside the submitted work: institutional research funding from Merck KGaA; institutional honoraria for an advisory role for MSD. T.N.M.S. reports, all outside the submitted work: advisory roles for Adaptive Biotechnologies, AIMM Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Merus, Neogene Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics and Scenic Biotech; research support from Merck KGaA; stockholdership of AIMM Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Merus, BioNTech, Neogene Therapeutics, and Scenic Biotech. C.U.B. reports, all outside the submitted work: institutional research funding from BMS, Novartis and Nanostring; institutional honoraria for advisory roles for BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, Genmab and Pierre Fabre; personal honoraria for an advisory role for Third Rock Ventures; stock ownership of Uniti Cars and Immagene. J.B.A.G.H. reports, all outside the submitted work: institutional honoraria for advisory roles for AIMM, Amgen, BioNTech, BMS, GSK, Ipsen, MSD, Merck Serono, Molecular Partners, Neogene Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Third Rock Ventures, Vaximm; stock option ownership of Neogene Therapeutics; Institutional research funding from Amgen, BioNTech, BMS, MSD, Novartis. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1038/s41467-021-26472-9",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

journal = "Nature Communications",

issn = "2041-1723",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "1",

}

Vos, JL, Elbers, JBW, Krijgsman, O, Traets, JJH, Qiao, XH, Van der Leun, AM, Lubeck, Y, Seignette, IM, Smit, LA, Willems, SM, Van den Brekel, MWM, Dirven, R, Karakullukcu, MB, Karssemakers, L, Klop, WMC, Lohuis, PJFM, Schreuder, WH, Smeele, LE, Van der Velden, LA, Tan, B, Onderwater, S, Jasperse, B, Vogel, WV, Al-Mamgani, A, Keijser, A, Van der Noort, V, Broeks, A, Hooijberg, E, Peeper, DS, Schumacher, TN, Blank, CU, De Boer, JP, Haanen, JBAG & Zuur, CL 2021, 'Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma', Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, 7348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26472-9

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. / Vos, J.L.; Elbers, J.B.W.; Krijgsman, O. et al.
In: Nature Communications, Vol. 12, No. 1, 7348, 22.12.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

AU - Vos, J.L.

AU - Elbers, J.B.W.

AU - Krijgsman, O.

AU - Traets, J.J.H.

AU - Qiao, X.H.

AU - Van der Leun, A.M.

AU - Lubeck, Y.

AU - Seignette, I.M.

AU - Smit, L.A.

AU - Willems, S.M.

AU - Van den Brekel, M.W.M.

AU - Dirven, R.

AU - Karakullukcu, M.B.

AU - Karssemakers, L.

AU - Klop, W.M.C.

AU - Lohuis, P.J.F.M.

AU - Schreuder, W.H.

AU - Smeele, L.E.

AU - Van der Velden, L.A.

AU - Tan, B.

AU - Onderwater, S.

AU - Jasperse, B.

AU - Vogel, W.V.

AU - Al-Mamgani, A.

AU - Keijser, A.

AU - Van der Noort, V.

AU - Broeks, A.

AU - Hooijberg, E.

AU - Peeper, D.S.

AU - Schumacher, T.N.

AU - Blank, C.U.

AU - De Boer, J.P.

AU - Haanen, J.B.A.G.

AU - Zuur, C.L.

N1 - Funding Information:Study oversight. This study was an investigator-initiated trial with the NKI as sponsor. The NKI designed the study, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. Funding was provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb through the International Immuno-Oncology Network and by the Riki Foundation. The trial protocol and its amendments were reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (MREC AVL, https://english.ccmo.nl/mrecs/accredited-mrecs/mrec-netherlands-cancer-institute-the-antoni-van-leeuwenhoek-hospital), under file number NL57794.031.16. The study’s design and conduct were in accordance with all relevant regulations regarding the use of human study participants and the 1964 Helsinki declaration, and was consistent with Good Clinical Practice guidelines as formulated by the International Conference on Harmonization. All patients provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. The authors affirm that the patient of whom clinical photography is shown in Fig. 1c provided additional informed consent for publication of the images. The patient depicted in Supplementary Fig. 2 had died at time of writing, and additional informed consent for the publication of the photographs was obtained from the patient’s partner.Funding Information:J.L.V., J.B.W.E., J.J.H.T., X.Q., A.vd.L., Y.L., I.S., L.S., S.O., B.J., W.V.V., A.A.M., V.vd.N., A.K., E.H., A.B., R.D., L.K., M.B.K., P.J.F.M.L., W.H.S., W.M.C.K., L.vd.V., and I.B.T. declare no competing interests. C.L.Z. reports receiving institutional research financial support from BMS to fund the present trial. M.W.M.vd.B. reports, outside the submitted work, institutional research funding from ATOS Medical. S.M.W. reports, all outside the submitted work: institutional research funding from Roche, Pfizer, MSD, Bayer, Amgen, BMS, AstraZeneca, Lilly and Nextcure. O.K. is employed at Neogene Therapeutics B.V., though at time of analysis and writing his employment was at the NKI. O.K. further reports, outside the submitted work, a pending patent application (title: “Gene signatures and method for predicting response to pd-1 antagonists and ctla-4 antagonists, and combination thereof”, number: WO2020005068A8). D.S.P. reports, all outside the submitted work, a pending patent application (title: “Gene signatures and method for predicting response to pd-1 antagonists and ctla-4 antagonists, and combination thereof”, number: WO2020005068A8) and a role as co-founder, shareholder and advisor of Immagene. J.P.d.B. reports, all outside the submitted work: institutional research funding from Merck KGaA; institutional honoraria for an advisory role for MSD. T.N.M.S. reports, all outside the submitted work: advisory roles for Adaptive Biotechnologies, AIMM Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Merus, Neogene Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics and Scenic Biotech; research support from Merck KGaA; stockholdership of AIMM Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Merus, BioNTech, Neogene Therapeutics, and Scenic Biotech. C.U.B. reports, all outside the submitted work: institutional research funding from BMS, Novartis and Nanostring; institutional honoraria for advisory roles for BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, Genmab and Pierre Fabre; personal honoraria for an advisory role for Third Rock Ventures; stock ownership of Uniti Cars and Immagene. J.B.A.G.H. reports, all outside the submitted work: institutional honoraria for advisory roles for AIMM, Amgen, BioNTech, BMS, GSK, Ipsen, MSD, Merck Serono, Molecular Partners, Neogene Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Third Rock Ventures, Vaximm; stock option ownership of Neogene Therapeutics; Institutional research funding from Amgen, BioNTech, BMS, MSD, Novartis.Publisher Copyright:© 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021/12/22

Y1 - 2021/12/22

N2 - Surgery for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in 30-50% five-year overall survival. In IMCISION (NCT03003637), a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, 32 HNSCC patients are treated with 2 doses (in weeks 1 and 3) of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) using nivolumab (NIVO MONO, n = 6, phase Ib arm A) or nivolumab plus a single dose of ipilimumab (COMBO, n = 26, 6 in phase Ib arm B, and 20 in phase IIa) prior to surgery. Primary endpoints are feasibility to resect no later than week 6 (phase Ib) and primary tumor pathological response (phase IIa). Surgery is not delayed or suspended for any patient in phase Ib, meeting the primary endpoint. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events are seen in 2 of 6 (33%) NIVO MONO and 10 of 26 (38%) total COMBO patients. Pathological response, defined as the %-change in primary tumor viable tumor cell percentage from baseline biopsy to on-treatment resection, is evaluable in 17/20 phase IIa patients and 29/32 total trial patients (6/6 NIVO MONO, 23/26 COMBO). We observe a major pathological response (MPR, 90-100% response) in 35% of patients after COMBO ICB, both in phase IIa (6/17) and in the whole trial (8/23), meeting the phase IIa primary endpoint threshold of 10%. NIVO MONO's MPR rate is 17% (1/6). None of the MPR patients develop recurrent HSNCC during 24.0 months median postsurgical follow-up. FDG-PET-based total lesion glycolysis identifies MPR patients prior to surgery. A baseline AID/APOBEC-associated mutational profile and an on-treatment decrease in hypoxia RNA signature are observed in MPR patients. Our data indicate that neoadjuvant COMBO ICB is feasible and encouragingly efficacious in HNSCC.Immune checkpoint blockade has become standard care for patients with recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here the authors present the results of a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, reporting safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab prior to standard-of-care surgery in patients with HNSCC. .

AB - Surgery for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in 30-50% five-year overall survival. In IMCISION (NCT03003637), a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, 32 HNSCC patients are treated with 2 doses (in weeks 1 and 3) of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) using nivolumab (NIVO MONO, n = 6, phase Ib arm A) or nivolumab plus a single dose of ipilimumab (COMBO, n = 26, 6 in phase Ib arm B, and 20 in phase IIa) prior to surgery. Primary endpoints are feasibility to resect no later than week 6 (phase Ib) and primary tumor pathological response (phase IIa). Surgery is not delayed or suspended for any patient in phase Ib, meeting the primary endpoint. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events are seen in 2 of 6 (33%) NIVO MONO and 10 of 26 (38%) total COMBO patients. Pathological response, defined as the %-change in primary tumor viable tumor cell percentage from baseline biopsy to on-treatment resection, is evaluable in 17/20 phase IIa patients and 29/32 total trial patients (6/6 NIVO MONO, 23/26 COMBO). We observe a major pathological response (MPR, 90-100% response) in 35% of patients after COMBO ICB, both in phase IIa (6/17) and in the whole trial (8/23), meeting the phase IIa primary endpoint threshold of 10%. NIVO MONO's MPR rate is 17% (1/6). None of the MPR patients develop recurrent HSNCC during 24.0 months median postsurgical follow-up. FDG-PET-based total lesion glycolysis identifies MPR patients prior to surgery. A baseline AID/APOBEC-associated mutational profile and an on-treatment decrease in hypoxia RNA signature are observed in MPR patients. Our data indicate that neoadjuvant COMBO ICB is feasible and encouragingly efficacious in HNSCC.Immune checkpoint blockade has become standard care for patients with recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here the authors present the results of a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, reporting safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab prior to standard-of-care surgery in patients with HNSCC. .

KW - SALVAGE SURGERY

KW - OPEN-LABEL

KW - RECURRENT

KW - CHEMOTHERAPY

KW - MUTAGENESIS

KW - APOBEC

KW - CANCER

KW - TREMELIMUMAB

KW - RADIOTHERAPY

KW - DURVALUMAB

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-021-26472-9

DO - 10.1038/s41467-021-26472-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 34937871

SN - 2041-1723

VL - 12

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

IS - 1

M1 - 7348

ER -

Vos JL, Elbers JBW, Krijgsman O, Traets JJH, Qiao XH, Van der Leun AM et al. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nature Communications. 2021 Dec 22;12(1):7348. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26472-9

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Barbera Armstrong

Last Updated:

Views: 6579

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (59 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Barbera Armstrong

Birthday: 1992-09-12

Address: Suite 993 99852 Daugherty Causeway, Ritchiehaven, VT 49630

Phone: +5026838435397

Job: National Engineer

Hobby: Listening to music, Board games, Photography, Ice skating, LARPing, Kite flying, Rugby

Introduction: My name is Barbera Armstrong, I am a lovely, delightful, cooperative, funny, enchanting, vivacious, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.